A range has been given within the subcontract for each Access Date, and the Key Dates have been defined as a duration from when each access is given. As a result, the subcontractor has planned the Clause 31 based on the latest dates within the range.
The contractor has rejected the programme under "the subcontractor's plans are not practicable" as one of the planned Key Dates falls outside the Key Dates defined within the contractor's contract with the employer (not the subcontractor's contract).
Does this situation demonstrate fair use of the term 'practicable' in justifying rejection of the programme?
The contractor has rejected the programme under "the subcontractor's plans are not practicable" as one of the planned Key Dates falls outside the Key Dates defined within the contractor's contract with the employer (not the subcontractor's contract).
Does this situation demonstrate fair use of the term 'practicable' in justifying rejection of the programme?