If the approvals are given quicker then this does bring forward the planned Completion but NOT the Completion Date. Even if 60.1(14) was applicable as a CE, there may be a cost saving but in terms of time clause 63.3 only talks about Completion Date moving later not earlier. The only two ways that Completion date can ever be brought forward is acceleration under clause 36 and accepting a defect under clause 44 (the latter of which I have never seen used).
This therefore creates terminal float - which is then owned by the Contractor. The only real benefit to this is protection against delay damages if you have X7) to the original date not the earlier one.
This therefore creates terminal float - which is then owned by the Contractor. The only real benefit to this is protection against delay damages if you have X7) to the original date not the earlier one.