NEC3 PSC - the situation is:
Consultant submitted a Compensation Event for a delay to the programme based on 2 'instructions', and indicated in the Compensation Event the value.
The Compensation event was accepted, with the comments that we acknowledge there was some impact to the contract based on one of the 'instructions' but the other 'instruction' was rejected and that we did not agree with all the detail and valuation within the Compensation event.
The consultant has now uploaded the quote showing the lump sum, so very little detail as to how they have come up with the figure, with the same figure as the Compensation Event.
What information should they be providing with the Quote?
Can I rejected the quote and asked them to show the detail of the build up of the cost, based on the one instruction?
Consultant submitted a Compensation Event for a delay to the programme based on 2 'instructions', and indicated in the Compensation Event the value.
The Compensation event was accepted, with the comments that we acknowledge there was some impact to the contract based on one of the 'instructions' but the other 'instruction' was rejected and that we did not agree with all the detail and valuation within the Compensation event.
The consultant has now uploaded the quote showing the lump sum, so very little detail as to how they have come up with the figure, with the same figure as the Compensation Event.
What information should they be providing with the Quote?
Can I rejected the quote and asked them to show the detail of the build up of the cost, based on the one instruction?