Here is an example of where 13.7 can be taken FAR too literally. It is there for good reason - don't give four separate early warnings or instructions on the same piece of paper that could/need to be answered/treated differently.
In the early warning pro-forms that I would recommend - I have a prompt that goes on to say "Is a risk reduction meeting required - Y/N?". If the answer is yes, it goes on to say who needs to attend, where and when it should be carried out.
I see no purpose what so ever to separate out these as two pieces of paper and do not see this as being contrary to the contract.
In the early warning pro-forms that I would recommend - I have a prompt that goes on to say "Is a risk reduction meeting required - Y/N?". If the answer is yes, it goes on to say who needs to attend, where and when it should be carried out.
I see no purpose what so ever to separate out these as two pieces of paper and do not see this as being contrary to the contract.